During that same visit to California, Einstein was asked to appear alongside the comic actor Charlie Chaplin during the Hollywood debut of the film City Lights. When they were mobbed by thousands, Chaplin remarked, “The people applaud me because everybody understands me, and they applaud you because no one understands you.” Einstein asked Chaplin, “What does it all mean?” Chaplin replied, “Nothing.”
What do you think?
The October 1927 Fifth Solvay International Conference on Electrons and Photons, where the world’s most notable physicists met to discuss the newly formulated quantum theory.
The leading figures were Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr. Einstein, disenchanted with Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, remarked “God does not play dice”. Bohr replied, “Einstein, stop telling God what to do”.
Seventeen of the 29 attendees were or became Nobel Prize winners, including Marie Curie, who alone among them, had won Nobel Prizes in two separate scientific disciplines.
I think this is a very interesting topic I want to share in this blog. What will you think of someone who was awarded the Nobel Prize? The immediate assumption when we hear someone who has won the Nobel Prize is that he must be a brilliant and hard-working individual.
But in this case is totally different. A Cambridge scientist Sir John Gurdon, who won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine this year, had a poor science report when at school. John B. Gurdon is a British development biologist who was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for the discovery that mature cells can be converted to stem cells in 2012, along with Shinya Yamanaka. His school science report began with the word ‘Disastrous’ and the teacher even questioned about his dream of becoming a scientist.
‘I believe he has ideas about becoming a scientist,’ his biology teacher wrote. ‘On his present showing this is quite ridiculous; if he can’t learn simple biological facts he would have no chance of doing the work of a specialist, and it would be a sheer waste of time, both on his part, and of those who have to teach him.’
This must be a lesson for teachers today!
School report for Nobel prize winner Dr John Gurdon from his days studying Biology at Eton College in 1949
Aliens, an extraterrestrial life
Do you believe in aliens? If you do, do they really exist? If you have a chance to cantact with aliens, what would you say to them?
The Wow! Signal
In 1977, a mysterious radio transmission was detected at the Big Ear radio observatory in Ohio, coming from the direction of the constellation Sagittarius. At its peak, the 72-second transmission was 30 times more powerful than ambient radiation from deep space, prompting the volunteer astronomer Jerry Ehman to scrawl “Wow!” next to the data on a computer printout, giving the signal its name.
The Wow! signal detected by Jerry R. Ehman on August 15, 1977, while working on a SETI project at the Big Ear radio telescope of The Ohio State University
No one knows whether the seemingly unnatural signal really was beamed toward us by aliens, and despite great effort, scientists have never managed to detect a repeat transmission from the same spot in the sky. Thirty-five years on, the Wow! signal remains a complete mystery.
And if they’re the aliens that sent the Wow! signal in the first place, they are likely to be an extremely advanced civilization. Scientists say the signal would have required a 2.2 gigawatt transmitter, vastly more powerful than any existing terrestrial radio station.
On Aug. 15, exactly 35 years after the Wow! signal was detected, scientist with National Geographic Channels will beamed humanity’s crowdsourced message into space in the direction from which the perplexing signal originated, as the reply for the signal.
SETI (the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) projects use scientific methods to search for intelligent life on other planets
How advanced could they possibly be?
If aliens do exist, however, we still can measure the advanced of their civilization by their energy consumption, as theoretical physicist Michio Kaku has written about that on his article The Physics of Extraterrestrial Civilizations.
When at school, we learned about the solar system in which the sun stood still in the center and the earth and planets moved around it, we call it as heliocentric model. You problaby already know that in the past, there was proposed a model that is opposed to the heliocentric model, the model called geocentric model.
Historically, the geocentric model was introduced around AD 150 by Ptolemy (ca. 85—ca. 165) to describe the motion of the celestial bodies. This model had been held by most educated Greeks at least since the time of Aristotle, who believed for mystical reasons that the earth should be at the center of the universe. Later European learning was based on the Greek sources that had been passed down, so that the ideas of Aristotle and Ptolemy became the basis for much of Western thought.
Nicolaus Copernicus (19 February 1473 – 24 May 1543) was a Renaissance astronomer and the first person to formulate a comprehensive heliocentric cosmology which displaced the Earth from the center of the universe
Otherwise, the heliocentric model was introduced by Aristarchus (310 BC – ca. 230 BC) that was rejected in favor of the geocentric theories of Aristotle and Ptolemy. Even so, the model was revived nearly 1800 years later by Copernicus, after which Johannes Kepler and Isaac Newton gave the theoretical explanation based on laws of physics, namely Kepler’s laws for the motion of planets and Newton’s laws on gravitational attraction and dynamics.
Ptolemy’s model of the cosmos was adopted by the Catholic Church and held as official doctrine for fourteen hundred years. It was not until 1543 that an alternative model was put forward by Copernicus in his book De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres), published only in the year of his death (though he had worked on his theory for several decades).
The Copernican model was held to contradict the Bible, which was interpreted as saying that the planets moved around the earth, even though the Bible never clearly stated that. In fact, at the time the Bible was written people believed the earth was flat. The Copernican model led to a furious debate as to whether the earth was at rest, culminating in Galileo’s trial for heresy in 1633 for advocating the Copernican model, and for thinking “that one may hold and defend as probable an opinion after it has been declared and defined contrary to the Holy Scripture.” He was found guilty, confined to house arrest for the rest of his life, and forced to recant. He is said to have muttered under his breath “Eppur si muove,” “But still it moves.” In 1992 the Roman Catholic Church finally acknowledged that it had been wrong to condemn Galileo.
Ptolemy and Copernicus, ca. 1686, at King Jan Sobieski’s library, Wilanów Palace: an early Copernicus depiction
Well, we have known the history already, but have you ever thought that the different pictures come as a result of different views of reality? (maybe you should read my previous posting entitled “What is Reality?”) It has become a philosophical debate for a long time to answer the question: which model is real? The geocentric model seemed natural because we are in earth, we don’t feel the earth under our feet is moving, and instead we see the sun that moves, rises in the east and sets in the west. But after all, we have already known that the heliocentric model is right and become the basic of modern physics.
According to Albert Einstein’s Theory of Relativity (you can see it here), we can use either Ptolemy model or Copernican model as a model of the universe, for our observations of the heavens can be explained by assuming either the earth or the sun to be at rest. It based on this principle: if we have two objects and nothing else, we are not possible to tell which object is moving and which object is standing still. I mean like this, we will obviously see the sun is moving and the earth is standing still because we do the observation from the earth. If we observe from the outside of our solar system, we will see the sun is standing still and the earth and the planets move around it. If we observe from the outside of our Milky Way galaxy, we will see both the earth and the sun move around its center.
The two models are true, we can’t say which model is wrong and which model is correct. But now, we are more likely to use the heliocentric model (Copernican system) simply because its advantage, that is the equations of motion will be much simpler in the frame of reference in which the sun is at rest.
The Little Thinker's Blog 